Phenological pattern of forest trees reveals climatic controls on phenophases and fruit development, hence providing key information for managing endangered species. We aimed to investigate tree crown phenology and fruit development of even-aged, dominant and codominant trees and to integrate the results with our study of wood radial growth of Cinnamomum kanehirae (Tsai et al., 2018). We conducted a 3-year ground-based observation of leaf, flower and fruit phenology. The fruit set and development were compared among 3 comparison groups: leafless inflorescence, leafy inflorescence and defoliated leafy inflorescence. The reproductive growth of C. kanehirae was present only in dominant trees. Dominant trees saw leaf flushes twice a year, while codominant trees once or twice. The overlapped spans of reproductive and vegetative growth implied resource competitions between these two phenophases and might cause fruitlet self-thinning in March and premature abortion in Autumn. Fruit development was correlated to the number of nearby ordinary leaves instead of inflorescence leaves. Reduced sunshine hours in autumn, 2011 may lead to the delayed flowering and truncated wood growing season of dominant trees in 2012. The different reproductive ability between tree social classes and the response of floral phenology to sunshine hours suggest important roles of light availability in fruit nursery.
Keyword: Cinnamomum kanehirae, fruit development, leafy inflorescence, resource allocation, tree social class
Ali, N.S. and C. Trivedi. 2011. Botanic gardens and climate change: A review of scientific activities at the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Biodivers. Conserv. 20(2): 295–307. DOI: 10.1007/s10531-010-9944-4View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Bepete, M. and A.N. Lakso. 1998. Differential effects of shade on early-season fruit and shoot growth rates in ‘Empire’ apple. HortScience 33(5): 823–825. DOI: 10.21273/HORTSCI.33.5.823View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Berntson, G.M. and P.M. Wayne. 2000. Characterizing the size dependence of resource acquisition within crowded plant populations. Ecology 81(4): 1072–1085. DOI: 10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[1072:CTSDOR]2.0.CO;2View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Callado, C.H., S.J.D.S. Neto, F.R. Scarano and C.G. Costa. 2001. Periodicity of growth rings in some flood-prone trees of the Atlantic Rain Forest in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Trees - Struct. Funct. 15(8): 492–497.
Chung, J.-D., C.-T. Chien and C.-P. Tsai. 2012. Seed tree forests and seed orchards of Cinnamomum kanehirae Hay. (in Chinese). For. Res. Newsl. 19: 21–25.
?ufar, K., P. Prislan, M.De Luis and J. Gri?ar. 2008. Tree-ring variation, wood formation and phenology of beech (Fagus sylvatica) from a representative site in Slovenia, SE Central Europe. Trees - Struct. Funct. 22(6): 749–758. DOI: 10.1007/s00468-008-0235-6View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Delpierre, N., Y. Vitasse, I. Chuine, J. Guillemot, S. Bazot, T. Rutishauser and C.B.K.K. Rathgeber. 2015. Temperate and boreal forest tree phenology: from organ-scale processes to terrestrial ecosystem models. Ann. For. Sci. 73(1): 5–25. DOI: 10.1007/s13595-015-0477-6View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Dickson, R.E. and J.G. Isebrands. 1991. Leaves as regulators of stress response. In: Mooney et al. (eds.), Response of Plants to Multiple Stresses, 422. Academic Press, San Diego. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-08-092483-0.50006-2View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Erel, R., U. Yermiyahu, H. Yasuor, D.C. Chamus, A. Schwartz, A. Ben-Gal and A. Dag. 2016. Phosphorous nutritional level, carbohydrate reserves and flower quality in olives. PLoS One 11(12): 1–19. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167591View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Erner, Y. and B. Bravdo. 1983. The importance of inflorescence leaves in fruit setting of ‘Shamouti’ orange. Acta Hortic. 139: 107–112. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.1983.139.14View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Erner, Y. and I. Shomer. 1996. Morphology and anatomy of stems and pedicels of spring flush shoots associated with Citrus fruit set. Ann. Bot. 78(5): 537–545. DOI: 10.1006/anbo.1996.0158View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Ferree, D.C., S.J. McArtney and D.M. Scurlock. 2001. Influence of irradiance and period of exposure on fruit set of French-American hybrid grapes. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 126(3): 283–290. DOI: 10.21273/JASHS.126.3.283View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Hasegawa, S., K. Koba, I. Tayasu, H. Takeda and H. Haga. 2003. Carbon autonomy of reproductive shoots of Siberian alder (Alnus hirsuta var. sibirica). J. Plant Res. 116(3): 183–188. DOI: 10.1007/s10265-003-0085-7View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Hoch, G. 2005. Fruit-bearing branchlets are carbon autonomous in mature broad-leaved temperate forest trees. Plant, Cell Environ. 28(5): 651–659. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2004.01311.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Huang, S.-G., K.-Y. Ho, K. Wu, Y.-C. Sen and W.-Y. Lieu. 1996. Survey on the composition and structure of natural Cinnamomum kanehirae forests. Taiwan J. For. Sci. 11(4): 349–360. DOI: 10.7075/TJFS.199612.0349View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Imai, S. and K. Ogawa. 2009. Quantitative analysis of carbon balance in the reproductive organs and leaves of Cinnamomum camphora (L.) Presl. J. Plant Res. 122(4): 429–437. DOI: 10.1007/s10265-009-0233-9View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Kagawa, A., A. Sugimoto and T.C. Maximov. 2006. 13CO2 pulse-labelling of photoassimilates reveals carbon allocation within and between tree rings. Plant Cell Environ. 29(8): 1571–1584. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2006.01533.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Kalbfleisch, J.D. and R.L. Prentice. 2002. The statistical analysis of failure time data. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, USA. DOI: 10.1002/9781118032985View Article
Kao, Y.-P. and S.-G. Huang. 1997a. Cutting propagation of Cinnamomum kanehirae. In: Koh (ed.), Symposium on Biology and Silviculture Techniques of Cinnamomum kanehirae (in Chinese), 85–104. Taiwan Forestry Research Institute, Taipei.
Kao, Y.-P. and S.-G. Huang. 1997b. Reforestation trial of Cinnamomum kanehirae rooted cutting in southern Taiwan. In: Koh (ed.), Symposium on Biology and Silviculture Techniques of Cinnamomum kanehirae (in Chinese), 119–124. Taiwan Forestry Research Institute, Taipei.
Kuster, T.M., M. Dobbertin, M.S. G?nthardt-Goerg, M.Schaub and M. Arend. 2014. A phenological timetable of oak growth under experimental drought and air warming. PLoS One 9(2): e89724. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089724View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Lee, S.-M. and I. B.-J. Jiang. 2011. Conservation of forest genetic resources: case studies (in Chinese). Taiwan For. J. 37: 16–22.
Lin, H.-C. 1997. Establishment of seed orchard for Cinnamomum kanehirae Hay. (in Chinese). Taiwan For. J. 23: 8–12.
Lin, T.-P., Y.-P. Cheng and S.-G. Huang. 1997. Allozyme variation in four geographic areas of Cinnamomum kanehirae. J. Hered. 88(5): 433–438. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a023131View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Lisi, C.S., F.M. Tomazello, P.C. Botosso, F.a. Roig, V.R.B. Maria, L. Ferreira-Fedele and a.R. a Voigt. 2008. Tree-ring formation, radial increment periodicity, and phenology of tree species from a seasonal semi-deciduous forest in southeast Brazil. IAWA J. 29(2): 189–207. DOI: 10.1163/22941932-90000179View ArticleGoogle Scholar
L?f, M. and N.T. Welander. 2000. Carry-over effects on growth and transpiration in Fagus sylvatica seedlings after drought at various stages of development. Can. J. For. Res. 30(3): 468–475. DOI: 10.1139/x99-232View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Meinzer, F.C., R. Ceulemans, T.M. Hinckley, J. Cerm?k, D. G. Sprugel, J. Kucera, J.S. Rombold, T.A. Martin and K.J. Brown. 1997. Crown conductance and tree and stand transpiration in a second-growth Abies amabilis forest. Can. J. For. Res. 27(6): 797–808. DOI: 10.1139/cjfr-27-6-797View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Michelot, A., S. Simard, C. Rathgeber, E. Dufr?ne and C. Damesin. 2012. Comparing the intra-annual wood formation of three European species (Fagus sylvatica, Quercus petraea and Pinus sylvestris) as related to leaf phenology and non-structural carbohydrate dynamics. Tree Physiol. 32(8): 1033–1043. DOI: 10.1093/treephys/tps052View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Morellato, L.P.C., B. Alberton, S.T. Alvarado, B. Borges, E. Buisson, M.G.G. Camargo, L.F. Cancian, D.W. Carstensen, D.F.E. Escobar, P.T.P. Leite, I. Mendoza, N.M.W.B. Rocha, N.C. Soares, T.S.F. Silva, V.G. Staggemeier, A.S. Streher, B.C. Vargas and C.A. Peres. 2016. Linking plant phenology to conservation biology. Biol. Conserv. 195: 60–72. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.12.033View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Moss, G. I., B.T. Steer and P.E. Kriedemann. 1972. The regulatory role of inflorescence leaves in fruit-setting by sweet orange (Citrus sinensis). Physiol. Plant. 27(3): 432–438. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1972.tb03639.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Nitta, I. and M. Ohsawa. 1997. Leaf dynamics and shoot phenology of eleven warm-temperate evergreen broad-leaved trees near their northern limit in central Japan. Plant Ecol. 130(1): 71–88. DOI: 10.1023/A:1009735709258View Article
Patel, V. R., S. Pramod and K.S. Rao. 2014. Cambial activity, annual rhythm of xylem production in relation to phenology and climatic factors and lignification pattern during xylogenesis in drum-stick tree (Moringa oleifera). Flora 209(10): 556–566.
DOI: 10.1016/j.flora.2014.08.002View ArticleGoogle Scholar
P?rez-de-Lis, G., J.M. Olano, V. Rozas, S. Rossi, R.A. V?zquez-Ruiz and I. Garc?a-Gonz?lez. 2017. Environmental conditions and vascular cambium regulate carbon allocation to xylem growth in deciduous oaks. Funct. Ecol. 31(3): 592–603. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2435.12789View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Pucha?ka, R., M. Koprowski, J. Gri?ar and R. Przybylak. 2017. Does tree-ring formation follow leaf phenology in Pedunculate oak (Quercus robur L.)? Eur. J. For. Res. 136(2): 259–268. DOI: 10.1007/s10342-017-1026-7View ArticleGoogle Scholar
R Core Team. 2016. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
Rao, K.S. and K.S. Rajput. 2001. Relationship between seasonal cambial activity, development of xylem and phenology in Azadirachta indica growing in different forests of Gujarat State. Ann. For. Sci. 58(6): 691–698. DOI: 10.1051/forest:2001156View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Rathcke, B. and E.P. Lacey. 1985. Phenological patterns of terrestrial plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 16(1): 179–214. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.es.16.110185.001143View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Rossi, S., T. Anfodillo, K. ?ufar, H.E. Cuny, A. Deslauriers, P. Fonti, D. Frank, J. Gri?ar, A. Gruber, J.G. Huang, T. Jyske, J. Ka?par, G. King, C. Krause, E. Liang, H. M?kinen, H. Morin, P. N?jd, W. Oberhuber, P. Prislan, C.B. Rathgeber, A. Saracino, I. Swidrak, V. Treml. 2016. Pattern of xylem phenology in conifers of cold ecosystems at the Northern Hemisphere. Glob. Chang. Biol. 22(11): 3804–3813. DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13317View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Rossi, S., C.B.K. Rathgeber and A. Deslauriers. 2009. Comparing needle and shoot phenology with xylem development on three conifer species in Italy. Ann. For. Sci. 66(2): 1–8. DOI: 10.1051/forest/2008088View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Saidha, T., E.E. Goldschmidt and S.P. Monselise. 1985. Endogenous cytokinins from developing ‘Shamouti’ orange fruits derived from leafy and leafless inflorescences. Sci. Horticulaturae 26(1): 35–41. DOI: 10.1016/0304-4238(85)90099-8View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Sellin, A., E. ?unapuu and A. Karusion. 2010. Experimental evidence supporting the concept of light-mediated modulation of stem hydraulic conductance. Tree Physiol. 30(12): 1528–1535. DOI: 10.1093/treephys/tpq091View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Sprugel, D.G., T.M. Hinckley and W. Schaap. 1991. The theory and practice of branch autonomy. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 22(1): 309–334. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.22.1.309View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Therneau, T.M. and P.M. Grambsch. 2000. Modeling survival data: extending the Cox model. Springer, New York.
Tsai, C.-C., L.-F. Hung, J.-D. Chung, S.-J. Chen, C.-T. Chien, W.-Y. Kao and L.-L. Kuo-Huang. 2018. Radial growth of Cinnamomum kanehirae Hayata displays a larger temperature sensitivity in dominant than codominant trees. Ann. For. Sci. 75(2): 52. DOI: 10.1007/s13595-018-0735-5View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Urban, J., E. Bedn??ov?, R. Plichta, V. Gryc, H. Vavr??k, J. Hacura, M. Fajstavr and J. Ku?era. 2015. Links between phenology and ecophysiology in a European beech forest. IForest 8(4): 438–447. DOI: 10.3832/ifor1307-007View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Welander, N.T. and B. Ottosson. 1998. The influence of shading on growth and morphology in seedlings of Quercus robur L. and Fagus sylvatica L. For. Ecol. Manage. 107(1-3): 117–126. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-1127(97)00326-5View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Worbes, M. 2002. One hundred years of tree-ring research in the tropics - A brief history and an outlook to future challenges. Dendrochronologia 20(1-2): 217–231. DOI: 10.1078/1125-7865-00018View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Y??ez-Espinosa, L., T. Terrazas and L. L?pez-Mata. 2006. Integrated analysis of tropical trees growth: a multivariate approach. Ann. Bot. 98(3): 637–645. DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcl142View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Yu, H.-M., N.-H. Chang, F.-C. Ma, Y.-S. Lin, K.-C. Chen, S.-D. Lin and L.-Y. Wu. 2012. The growth performance of Cinnamomum kanehirai (in Chinese). For. Res. Newsl. 19: 39–42.
Yu, H.-M. and F.-W. Horng. 1997. Out-planted performance of Cinnamomum kanehirae shoot cuttings. In: Koh (ed.), Proceedings of the Symposium on Biology and Silviculture Techniques of Cinnamomum kanehirae (in Chinese), 113–117. Taiwan Forestry Research Institute, Taipei.
Copyright @ Taiwania Editorial Office. All rights reserved.
Published by College of Life Science, National Taiwan University & Biodiversity Association of Taiwan, Taiwan
Contact address: Institute of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, College of Life Science, National Taiwan University, No.1, Sec.4, Roosevelt Road, Taipei 10617, Taiwan