Research Paper
Random choice of the tropical fire ant in the enclosed space
Li Chuan Lai, Tzu-Yen Chao
Published on: 28 February 2021
Page: 73 - 78
DOI: 10.6165/tai.2021.66.73
Abstract
The tropical fire ant Solenopsis geminata is an invasive ant species in Taiwan. In the present study, we investigated the turning behaviour of the tropical fire ant in the T-maze when external cues were shielded. In total, 1800 observations (600 workers × 3 choices) were conducted in the study. Workers presented eight types of left–right choice after three choices in the T-maze experiment. We demonstrated that the turning behaviour of S. geminata workers was not significantly affected by the four cardinal directions. Moreover, eight types of left–right choice of workers were divided into four groups. The result shows that the ratio of the four groups is 1.33:3.27:3.25:1 (≈1:3:3:1). Notably, based on the binomial expansion, the left–right choice of workers is random. The workers’ choices did not exhibit a leftward or rightward turning bias after three choices in the experiment. Thus, we speculate that in the absence visual cues, S. geminata workers might navigate using random choice strategies when exploring the enclosed space.
Keyword: Left–right choice, Random choice, Solenopsis geminate, T-maze, Turning behaviour
Literature Cited
Aksoy, V. and Y. Camlitepe. 2005. Use of idiothetic information for left/right turning memory by the ant Formica pratensis. Biologia, Bratislava 60(2): 197–200.
Bartumeus, F., M. G. E. da Luz, G. M. Viswanathan and J. Catalan. 2005. Animal search strategies: A quantitative random-walk analysis. Ecology 86(11): 3078–3087.
DOI: 10.1890/04-1806View Article
Google Scholar
Basari, N., A.C. Bruendl, C.E. Hemingway, N.W. Roberts, A.B. Sendova-Franks and N.R. Franks. 2014. Landmarks and ant search strategies after interrupted tandem runs. J. Exp. Biol. 217(6): 944–954.
DOI: 10.1242/jeb.087296View Article
Google Scholar
Buehlmann, C., A. S. D. Fernandes and P. Graham. 2018. The interaction of path integration and terrestrial visual cues in navigating desert ants: What can we learn from path characteristics? J. Exp. Biol. 221(1): jeb167304.
DOI: 10.1242/jeb.167304View Article
Google Scholar
Cosens, D. and N. Toussaint. 1985. An experimental study of the foraging strategy of the wood ant Formica aquilonia. Anim. Behav. 33(2): 541–552.
DOI: 10.1016/S0003-3472(85)80077-4View Article
Google Scholar
Deneubourg, J.L., S. Aron, S. Goss, J.M. Pasteels and G. Duerinck. 1986. Random behaviour, amplification processes and number of participants: How they contribute to the foraging properties of ants. Physica D 22(1-3): 176–186.
DOI: 10.1016/0167-2789(86)90239-3View Article
Google Scholar
Diez, L., J.-L. Deneubourg, L. Hoebeke and C. Detrain. 2011. Orientation in corpse-carrying ants: Memory or chemical cues? Anim. Behav. 81(6): 1171–1176.
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.02.026View Article
Google Scholar
Dussutour, A., J.-L. Deneubourg and V. Fourcassi?. 2005. Amplification of individual preferences in a social context: The case of wall-following in ants. Proc. Royal Soc. B 272(1564): 705–714.
Endlein, T. and M. Sitti. 2018. Innate turning preference of leaf-cutting ants in the absence of external orientation cues. J. Exp. Biol. 221(14): jeb177006.
DOI: 10.1242/jeb.177006View Article
Google Scholar
Fleischmann, P.N., R. Grob, R. Wehner and W. Rossler. 2017. Species-specific differences in the fine structure of learning walk elements in Cataglyphis ants. J. Exp. Biol. 220(13): 2426–2435.
DOI: 10.1242/jeb.158147View Article
Google Scholar
Fleischmann, P.N., W. R?ssler and R. Wehner. 2018. Early foraging life: Spatial and temporal aspects of landmark learning in the ant Cataglyphis noda. J. Comp. Physiol. A 204(6): 579–592.
DOI: 10.1007/s00359-018-1260-6View Article
Google Scholar
Freas, C.A. and P. Schultheiss. 2018. How to navigate in different environments and situations: Lessons from ants. Front. Psychol. 9: 841.
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00841View Article
Google Scholar
Gerbier, G., S. Garnier, C. Rieu, G. Theraulaz and V. Fourcassi?. 2008. Are ants sensitive to the geometry of tunnel bifurcation? Anim. Cogn. 11(4): 637–642.
DOI: 10.1007/s10071-008-0153-4View Article
Google Scholar
Goss, S., S. Aron, J.-L. Deneubourg and J.M. Pasteels. 1989. Self-organized shortcuts in the argentine ant. Naturwissenschaften 76(12): 579–581.
DOI: 10.1007/BF00462870View Article
Google Scholar
Harrison, J.F., J.H. Fewell, T.M. Stiller and M.D. Breed. 1989. Effects of experience on use of orientation cues in the giant tropical ant. Anim. Behav. 37(5): 869–871.
DOI: 10.1016/0003-3472(89)90076-6View Article
Google Scholar
Huber, R. and M. Knaden. 2018. Desert ants possess distinct memories for food and nest odors. PNAS 115(41): 10470–10474.
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1809433115View Article
Google Scholar
Hunt, E.R., T. O'Shea-Wheller, G.F. Albery, T.H. Bridger, M. Gumn and N. R. Franks. 2014. Ants show a leftward turning bias when exploring unknown nest sites. Biol. Lett. 10(12): 20140945.
DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2014.0945View Article
Google Scholar
Hunt, E.R., C. Dornan, A.B. Sendova-Franks and N.R. Franks. 2018. Asymmetric ommatidia count and behavioural lateralization in the ant Temnothorax albipennis. Sci. Rep. 8(1): 5825.
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-23652-4View Article
Google Scholar
Jaffe, K., C. Ramos, C. Lagalla and L. Parra. 1990. Orientation cues used by ants. Insectes Soc. 37(2): 101–115.
DOI: 10.1007/BF02224024View Article
Google Scholar
Knaden, M. and P. Graham. 2016. The sensory ecology of ant navigation: From natural environments to neural mechanisms. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 61(1): 63–76.
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-ento-010715-023703View Article
Google Scholar
Lai, L.C., M.C. Chiu, C.W. Tsai and W.J. Wu. 2018. Composition of harvested seeds and seed selection by the invasive tropical fire ant, Solenopsis geminata (hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Taiwan. Arthropod Plant Interact. 12(4): 623–632.
DOI: 10.1007/s11829-018-9611-3View Article
Google Scholar
Lai, L.C., K.H. Hua, C.C. Yang, R.N. Huang and W.J. Wu. 2009. Secretion profiles of venom alkaloids in Solenopsis geminata (hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Taiwan. Environ. Entomol. 38(3): 879–884.
DOI: 10.1603/022.038.0342View Article
Google Scholar
Li, L., H. Peng, J. Kurths, Y. Yang and H.J. Schellnhuber. 2014. Chaos–order transition in foraging behavior of ants. PNAS 111(23): 8392–8397.
DOI: 10.1007/BF00199474View Article
Google Scholar
Muller, M. and R. Wehner. 1988. Path integration in desert ants, Cataglyphis fortis. PNAS 85(14): 5287–5290.
DOI: 10.1007/BF00199474View Article
Google Scholar
Mahavni, A., E.K. Lessig and P. Nonacs. 2019. Exploratory behavior of argentine ants (Linepithema humile) encountering novel areas. Insectes Soci. 66(4): 653–656.
DOI: 10.1007/s00040-019-00723-xView Article
Google Scholar
Narendra, A., S. Gourmaud and J. Zeil. 2013. Mapping the navigational knowledge of individually foraging ants, Myrmecia croslandi. Proc. Royal Soc. B 280(1765): 20130683.
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2013.0683View Article
Google Scholar
Salo, O. and R. Rosengren. 2001. Memory of location and site recognition in the ant Formica uralensis (hymenoptera: Formicidae). Ethology 107(8): 737–752.
DOI: 10.1046/j.1439-0310.2001.00702.xView Article
Google Scholar
Schultheiss, P., K. Cheng and A.M. Reynolds. 2015. Searching behavior in social hymenoptera. Learn Motiv. 50: 59-67.
DOI: 10.1016/j.lmot.2014.11.002View Article
Google Scholar
Shen, J.-X., Z.-M. Xu and E. Hankes. 1998. Direct homing behaviour in the ant Tetramorium caespitum (formicidae, myrmicinae). Anim. Behav. 55(6): 1443–1450.
DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1997.0718View Article
Google Scholar
Steck, K., B. S. Hansson and M. Knaden. 2009. Smells like home: Desert ants, Cataglyphis fortis, use olfactory landmarks to pinpoint the nest. Front. Zool. 6(1): 5.
DOI: 10.1186/1742-9994-6-5View Article
Google Scholar
Walker, J. 1986. Methods for going through a maze without becoming lost or confused. Sci. Am. 255(6):140–147.
Wehner, R., T. Hoinville, H. Cruse and K. Cheng. 2016. Steering intermediate courses: Desert ants combine information from various navigational routines. J. Comp. Physiol. A 202(7): 459–472.
DOI: 10.1007/s00359-016-1094-zView Article
Google Scholar
Wittlinger, M., R. Wehner and H. Wolf. 2006. The ant odometer: Stepping on stilts and stumps. Science 312(5782): 1965–1967.
DOI: 10.1126/science.1126912View Article
Google Scholar
Zeil, J., A. Narendra and W. Sturzl. 2014. Looking and homing: How displaced ants decide where to go. Proc. Royal Soc. B 369(1636): 20130034.
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0034View Article
Google Scholar
Zeil, J. and P. N. Fleischmann. 2019. The learning walks of ants (hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecol. News 29: 93–110.
DOI: 10.13102/sociobiology.v66i3.4330View Article
Google Scholar