Research Paper

Pueraria omeiensis (Fabaceae), a new species from Southwest China

Bo Pan, Xin Yao, Richard T. Corlett, Wen-Bin Yu

Published on: 04 January 2023

Page: 31 - 38

DOI: 10.6165/tai.2023.68.31

Abstract

Pueraria omeiensis (Fabaceae, Phaseoleae) is a new species described and validly published in this study. Morphologically, it resembles Pueraria bouffordii, P. montana, and P. xyzhuii, but it differs in having densely lenticellate stems and round to suborbicular terminal leaflets. The molecular phylogeny also supported it as a distinct species. This climber occurs in montane forests of Chongqing, Guangxi, Guizhou, Sichuan, and Yunnan, and it is here evaluated as Least Concern (LC) according to IUCN criteria.

Keyword: Leguminosae, Phaseoleae, Pueraria bouffordii, Pueraria montana, Pueraria xyzhuii, Pueraria edulis

Literature Cited

de Candolle, A.P. 1825. Pueraria. Annales des Sciences Naturelles 4: 97. [Paris]

Doyle, J.J., Doyle, J.L. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochemical Bulletin 19: 11–15.

Egan, A.N., Pan B. 2015a. Pueraria stracheyi, a new synonym to Apios carnea (Fabaceae). Phytotaxa 218(2): 147–155.
DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.218.2.4View Article Google Scholar

Egan, A.N., Pan, B. 2015b. Resolution of polyphyly in Pueraria (Leguminosae, Papilionoideae): The creation of two new genera, Haymondia and Toxicopueraria, the resurrection of Neustanthus, and a new combination in Teyleria. Phytotaxa 218(3): 201–226.
DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.218.3.1View Article Google Scholar

Egan, A.N., Vatanparast, M., Cagle W. 2016. Parsing polyphyletic Pueraria: Delimiting distinct evolutionary lineages through phylogeny. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 104: 44–59.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2016.08.001View Article Google Scholar

Huang, Z.-Q. 2017. Study on quality evaluation of several varieties of Puerariae Radix from Sichuan Province. Master thesis, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine.

IUCN 2019. Guidelines for Using the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria. Version 14.

Jiang, K.-W., Tian, B., Pan, B. 2022. Legume additions to the flora of China. Phytotaxa 532(1): 1–21.
DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.532.1.1View Article Google Scholar

Jin, J.J., Yu, W.B., Yang, J. B., Song, Y., dePamphilis, C. W., Yi, T.S., Li, D.Z. 2020. Getorganelle: A fast and versatile toolkit for accurate de novo assembly of organelle genomes. Genome Biol. 21(1): 241.
DOI: 10.1186/s13059-020-02154-5View Article Google Scholar

Kalyaanamoorthy, S., Minh, B.Q., Wong, T.K.F., von Haeseler, A., Jermiin, L.S. 2017. Modelfinder: Fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nat. Methods 14(6): 587–589.
DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.4285View Article Google Scholar

Katoh, K., Standley, D.M. 2013. Mafft multiple sequence alignment software version 7: Improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30(4): 772–780.
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/mst010View Article Google Scholar

Kearse, M., Moir, R., Wilson, A., Stones-Havas, S., Cheung, M., Sturrock, S., Buxton, S., Cooper, A., Markowitz, S., Duran, C., Thierer, T., Ashton, B., Meintjes, P., Drummond, A. 2012. Geneious basic: An integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics 28(12): 1647–1649.
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts199View Article Google Scholar

Le, Z.-F., Zhu, X.-Y. 2009. Pueraria yunnanensis (Fabaceae) reinstated. Ann. Bot. Fenn. 46(5): 419–424.
DOI: 10.5735/085.046.0507View Article Google Scholar

Lee, J., Hymowitz, T. 2001. A molecular phylogenetic study of the subtribe Glycininae (Leguminosae) derived from the chloroplast dna rps16 intron sequences. Am. J. Bot. 88(11): 2064–2073.
DOI: 10.2307/3558432View Article Google Scholar

Nguyen, L.T., Schmidt, H.A., von Haeseler A., Minh, B.Q. 2015. Iq-tree: A fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 32(1): 268–274.
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msu300View Article Google Scholar

Ronquist, F., Teslenko, M., v.d. Mark, P., Ayres, D.L., Darling, A., H?hna, S., Larget, B., Liu, L., Suchard, M.A., Huelsenbeck, J.P. 2012. Mrbayes 3.2: Efficient bayesian phylogenetic inference and model selection across a large model space. Syst. Biol. 61(3): 539–542.
DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/sys029View Article Google Scholar

Sang, Y.-S., Min, Z.-D. 2000. Studies on the constituents of Pueraria omeiensis Tang et Wang. J. China Pharm. Univ. 31: 408–410.

Sang, Y.-S., Shi, H.-M., Min, Z.-D. 2002. Studies on chemical constituents from root of Pueraria omeiensis II. Chin. Tradit. Herb. Drugs. 33: 776–778.

Turland, N.J., Wiersema, J. H., Barrie, F.R., Greuter, W., Hawksworth, D.L., Herendeen, P.S., Knapp, S., Kusber, W.-H., Li, D.-Z., Marhold, K., May, T.W., McNeill, J., Monro, A.M., Prado, J., Price, M. J., Smith, G.F. 2018. International code of nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (shenzhen code). Koeltz Botanical Books, Glash?tten.

van der Maesen, L.J.G. 1985. Revision of the genus Pueraria DC. with some notes on Teyleria Backer (Leguminosae). Taylor & Francis, Agricultural University Wageningen, Wageningen.

van der Maesen, L.J.G., Almeida, S.M. 1988. Two corrections to the nomenclature in the revision of Puearia DC. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 85: 233–234.

Wang, F.T., Tang, T. 1955. Flora Illustralis Plantarum Primarum Sinicarum, Leguminosae. Science Press, Beijing. pp 679–680.

Ward, D.B. 1998. Pueraria montana: The correct scientific name of the kudzu. Castanea 63: 76–77.

Wu, D.-L., Thulin, M. 2010. Pueraria DC. In: Z.-Y. Wu, R. H. Raven, and H.-D. Yuan (Eds), Flora of China 10. Science Press and Missouri Botanical Garden Press, Beijing and St Louis. pp. 244–248.
DOI: 10.3100/025.015.0214View Article Google Scholar

Wu, T.-L., Chen, Z.-Y., Huang, X.-X. 1994. A study of Chinese Pueraria. J. Trop. Subtrop. Bot. 2: 12–21.